
INTRODUCTION TO SURFACE ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
FOR
MUSCLE MONITORING OF MASTICATORY MUSCLES
EMG AND ACTION POTENTIALS
The conductive properties of the whole nerve and muscle allow measurement of electrical activity with extra-cellular (surface) electrodes. Typical monitoring sites for masticatory muscles include the masseter, anterior temporalis, posterior temporalis, and digastric suprahyoid muscles. These electrodes to not penetrate the cell membrane, but detect potential differences external to the muscle fiber and distant from the potential source. In the whole muscle or nerve, local current flow is not limited to the membrane surface but will spread throughout the surrounding tissue. A field of current spreads through the extracellular space from the depolarizing membrane.
There is no external current flow and therefore no potential difference is recorded between the two poles of the bipolar electrode until a cellular action potential is initiated. As depolarization initiated by a neural action potential proceeds along the muscle fiber, the outward flow of current through adjacent regions to the membrane makes the recording electrode more positive with respect to the reference electrode.
Action potentials propagating down the nerve are the means by which the central nervous system potentiates contraction of muscle fibers. When the neural action potential crosses the motor end plate the subsequent potentiation of muscle cell electrical discharge creates a current that has a higher potential relative to the reference electrode. As the action potential moves further along the muscle fiber, the recording EMG electrode ceases to be affected by the current flow and the action potential returns to the original baseline.
SURFACE ELECTROMYOGRAPHY
Surface electromyography has long been the "gold standard" for monitoring muscle activity of masticatory muscle at REST and in FUNCTION. The value of surface EMG is best expressed by C.J. DeLuca, Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Research and Professor of Neurology at Boston University, "Surface EMG utilizes sensing electrodes placed on the skin, which allows the clinician to directly and accurately monitor muscle activity. This is far more accurate procedure than conventional manual palpation or touch which can provide only gross assessments of muscle activity." 1988. W.D. McCall also states "...there is general agreement among both clinicians and investigators that masticatory muscle activity is increased in symptomatic patients as compared with normal subjects. Electromyography is the principal tool used to investigate such differences." (The Musculature. A Textbook of Occlusion, Quintessence, 1988).
Many investigators have confirmed the safety, efficacy
and value of surface electromyography for assessing
RESTING and FUNCTIONAL status of muscle. There is
a broad body of literature that supports the physiologic
basis for using surface EMG as an aid in assessment
of muscle function/dysfunction. (Moyers, 1949; Lippold,
1952; Perry, 1954; Bigland and Lippold, 1954; Jarabak,
1956; Perry, 1957; Porritt, 1960; Grossman, 1961;
Moss and Greenfield, 1965; Moller, 1976; Mitani et
al., 1972; Moss and Chalmers, 1974; Moller, 1975;
Yemm, 1976; Milner-Brown and Stein, 1975; Pruim et
al., 1978; Bakke et al., 1980; Riise et al., 1982;
Sheikholeslam et al., 1982; Sheikholeslam et al.,
1983, Riise et al., 1984; Algren et al., 1985; Myslinski
et al., 1985; Sherman, 1985; Goldensohn, 1986; Hermans
et al., 1986; Kydd et al., 1986; Sheikholeslam et
al., 1986; Balciunas et al., 1987, Burdette and Gale,
1987; Wood, 1987; Crain and Klemons, 1988; Chong-Shan
and Hui-yun, 1989; Christensen, 1989; Koole et al.;
Neill et al., 1989; Van Eijen et al., 1990; Jankelson,
1992; Lynn et al, 1992)
There is substantial evidence based upon controlled studies that confirm that surface electromyography is reliable and reproducible (Bigland and Lippold, 1954; Goldensohn, 1966; Lloyd, 1971; Mitani and Yamashita, 1972; Molin, 1972; Moss, 1974; Ahlgren, 1975; Milner-Brown and Stein, 1975; Moller, 1975; Mitani and Yamashita, 1978; Hermens et al., 1986; Kydd et al., 1986; Burdette and Gale, 1987; Christensen, 1989; Neill, 1989; Van Eijden, et al., 1990; Dean et al., 1992)
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY TO MONITOR MUSCLE POSTURAL (REST) ACTIVITY
There is a large body of literature documenting the validity and efficacy of surface electromyography to study resting and hypertonic states of masticatory muscles. ( Jarabak, 1956; Shpuntoff and Shpuntoff, 1956; Lous, et al., 1970; Moller et al., 1971; Yemm, 1976; Clark et al., 1979; Clark et al., 1981; Riise et al., 1982; Sheikholeslam et al., 1982; Panteleo et al., 1983; Keefe and Dolan, 1984; Riise et al., 1984; Mann et al, 1985; Myslinski et al., 1985; Sherman, 1985; Sheikholeslam et al., 1986; Crain and Klemons, 1988; Erlandson and Poppen, 1988; Konchak et al., 1988; Chong-Shan and Hui-yun, 1989; Gervais et al., 1989; Carlson et al., 1991; Lynn, 1990; Mann et al., 1990; Lynn and Mazzocco, 1991; Burdette and Gale, 1988; Burdette and Gale, 1992)
Many of the above studies have suggested
that the postural activity of temporalis and masseter
muscles are significantly higher in subjects with
functional disorders of the masticatory system than
controls without signs and symptoms of dysfunction.
ELECTROMYOGRAPHY TO MONITOR MUSCLE FUNCTION
The use of EMG to study muscle function is well documented. There are many studies confirming a strong linear relationship between muscle motor unit recruitment, muscle force and EMG. There are many studies showing that maximal bite force and the electrical activity of masticatory muscle during maximal bite in the intercuspal position is significantly weaker in patients with functional disorders of the masticatory system than controls without disorders. ( Lippold, 1952; Bigland and Lippold, 1954; Goldensohn, 1966; Lloyd, 1971; Molin, 1972; Helkimo et al., 1975; Milner-Brown and Stein, 1975; Moller, 1975; Pruim et al., 1978; Bakke and Moller, 1980; Sheikholeslam et al., 1980; Panteleo et al., 1983; Sheikholeslam and Riise, 1983; Cooper and Rabuzzi, 1984; McDonald and Hannam, 1984; Riise et al., 1984; Riise and Sheikholeslam, 1984; Ahlgren, 1985; Kydd et al., 1986; Balciunas et al., 1987; Wood, 1987; Michler et al., 1988; Chong-Shan, 1989; Chong-Shan and Hui-yun, 1989; Humsi et al., 1989; Christensen, 1989; Mongini et al., 1989; Neill et al., 1989; Jankelson, 1990; Van Eijden et al., 1990; Bakke and Michler, 1991; Koole et al., 1991; Lynn and Mazzocco, 1991; Naeije and Hansson, 1991; Choi, 1992; Dean et al., 1992; Kroon and Naeije, 1992; Visser, et al., 1992; Hickman et al., 1993)
Following are abstracts of studies verifying the use, safety, and efficacy of Electromyography to monitor masticatory muscle function / dysfunction.
Electromyographic activity of the lateral pterygoid muscle
© copyright 2002 - 2008, Dr. Rhys Spoor & Seattle temporomandibular joint syndrome, all rights reserved

Dr. Spoor is an accredited member of the AACD